Re: Challenge "Alberti Challenge - Part 2"
By: RandyWaterhouse on Jan. 21, 2024, 7:42 a.m.
Thanks for the nice comment, I appreciate it!
By: RandyWaterhouse on Jan. 21, 2024, 7:42 a.m.
Thanks for the nice comment, I appreciate it!
By: RandyWaterhouse on Aug. 28, 2023, 7 a.m.
Yes, I know. But a specific one of the two plaintexts was asked for as the solution and at first I had the wrong one. Thanks for the comment anyway.
By: RandyWaterhouse on May 2, 2023, 6:01 p.m.
German version now has the ciphertext, too, thanks! Downloaded it from the English version anyway ;-)
By: RandyWaterhouse on May 2, 2023, 5:44 p.m.
The fix is in only for the English version, not the German one.
By: RandyWaterhouse on Oct. 24, 2022, 6:58 a.m.
Congrats on solving the challenge, madness! And you are right, you can't assume that the plaintext starts on a word boundary.
By: RandyWaterhouse on Sept. 1, 2022, 7:04 a.m.
I get that. But I don't think it's relevant, the unicity distance is a function of the cipher system/cipher algorithm, not of the specific message. As I said in my earlier post, you often have the situation that several keys deliver the same descrip…
By: RandyWaterhouse on Aug. 21, 2022, 12:09 p.m.
Not sure I can follow that logic. If, for example, you have a simple monoalphabetic substitution but the message does not contain alle available letters from the plain alphabet (which, for short messages, typically is the case) one still has a keysp…
By: RandyWaterhouse on May 28, 2022, 11:53 a.m.
Dear George,
thanks for the nice comment and congratulations to being the first to solve the challenge!
Seems I messed up the unicity distance calculation, sorry for that!
Kind regards, Peter
By: RandyWaterhouse on May 5, 2022, 1:09 p.m.
The link in the challenge description is broken. This seems to be the correct link: https://github.com/Networc/networc.github.com/blob/master/_posts/2012-04-25-keyshanc-real-time-overview.md
By: RandyWaterhouse on April 15, 2022, 7:17 a.m.
Hi tryone144, thanks for fixing the verification process! I noticed that the challenge is now displayed as solved in my account. Happy Easter days to everybody!
By: RandyWaterhouse on April 14, 2022, 1:10 p.m.
I think I solved the affine cipher and got a solution which "looks right". It is rejected, however. Could anyone who already solved this check my solution? Thanks!
By: RandyWaterhouse on April 14, 2022, 1:09 p.m.
I easily found the key and have a 26key file which reproduces the plaintext when used with the provided Python code. However, like many others, I have trouble with the format of the submission. I submitted a 104 character string of values in the ran…
By: RandyWaterhouse on March 15, 2022, 7:07 a.m.
To answer my own question: I accidentally swapped the two ciphers in my spreadsheet, so I submitted the wrong one's final 10 chars.
All good now ;-)
By: RandyWaterhouse on March 14, 2022, 5:43 p.m.
My solution is rejected even though I'm pretty confident it is correct. I deciphered both cipher texts (including identifying the original sources of the plain texts) and asserted that the key is the same for both (i.e. I have one key which produces…
By: RandyWaterhouse on March 11, 2022, 7:54 a.m.
In the provided file 'T52 Functional Description', section 'Code Wheels', is an obvious error: it's stated 'those wheels have 47, 53, 59, 61, 64, 64, 67, 69, 71, and 73 code pins, respectively'. The second 64 must be a 65. Otherwise the sizes would'…